I think that the neck of the maxillary canine on the patient's left (2.3) could be pushed out which would push the incisal edge in a little and make the arch look more aligned.
The 4.3 and 2.3 are not in alignment with the arch.To rectify this I would push the necks of these teeth out a bit allowing the incisal edge to be aligned with the anterior teeth and posterior teeth. The 1.2 incisal edge is at the same height as the 1.1. I would push the 1.2 1mm to 1.5mm above the incisal edge of the 1.1.
Gingival margins creating food traps. necks of maxillaru centrals can be brought slightly out. The neck of the canine on the patients left can be pushed out slightly. the mandibular posteriors on the patients left look as though they are falling lingually or maybe its the wax thats too thick???? looks like the maxillary anteriors can be brought slightly down as the posteriors look lower.
on the patients left, the canine(2.3) and first pre-molar(2.4)needs to be re-set to make the necks more prominent and in correspondences with the patients right. no curve of spee and seems as 1st and 2nd molars on the mandible are set to lower in turn causing a heavy bite, which may lead to a greater ridge resorption. also occlusion of the 2nd molars seem as they set in cross bite. are the mandibular posterior teeth of the patients right set on the ridge?
Here are my comments: ~ wax up and festooning in complete ~ 2.3 neck can be pushed out labially in order to align the incisal edge better ~ curve of Spee too flat ~ anterior-posterior angle of teeth to be improved ~ teeth might be slightly off the ridge ~ occlusion to be improved - cusp to fossa relationship ~ 4.3 too far in ~ lipline not mainrained ~ wax overextending onto the land area - flanges too bulky side view - maxillary incisors should be over the depth of the sulcus ~ reduce the wax in the tuberosity and hamular notch area
I think that the neck of the maxillary canine on the patient's left (2.3) could be pushed out which would push the incisal edge in a little and make the arch look more aligned.
ReplyDeletei agree with Samantha there and same applies to 2.2.
ReplyDeleteThe 4.3 and 2.3 are not in alignment with the arch.To rectify this I would push the necks of these teeth out a bit allowing the incisal edge to be aligned with the anterior teeth and posterior teeth. The 1.2 incisal edge is at the same height as the 1.1. I would push the 1.2 1mm to 1.5mm above the incisal edge of the 1.1.
ReplyDeleteGingival margins creating food traps. necks of maxillaru centrals can be brought slightly out. The neck of the canine on the patients left can be pushed out slightly. the mandibular posteriors on the patients left look as though they are falling lingually or maybe its the wax thats too thick???? looks like the maxillary anteriors can be brought slightly down as the posteriors look lower.
ReplyDeletethe occlusion of the anterior teeth can be worked on, maybe push the neck of the 1.3 tooth more in so that is does not appear too prominent
ReplyDelete1. Right mandibular canine is leaning too far towards the labial.
ReplyDelete2. Teeth necks are exposed.
the necks of the mandibular right canine and the maxillary left canine are slightly in, this makes the cusps of this canines to lean out
ReplyDelete4.3 neck should be made prominent and 2.3 neck should be made prominent
ReplyDeleteon the patients left, the canine(2.3) and first pre-molar(2.4)needs to be re-set to make the necks more prominent and in correspondences with the patients right. no curve of spee and seems as 1st and 2nd molars on the mandible are set to lower in turn causing a heavy bite, which may lead to a greater ridge resorption. also occlusion of the 2nd molars seem as they set in cross bite. are the mandibular posterior teeth of the patients right set on the ridge?
ReplyDeleteThere is no curve of spee. maxillary 2.3, neck can be brought out. Maxillary posteriors are hanging.
ReplyDeleteThe canine 2-3 should be angled with its neck more inclined outward
ReplyDeleteHere are my comments:
ReplyDelete~ wax up and festooning in complete
~ 2.3 neck can be pushed out labially in order to align the incisal edge better
~ curve of Spee too flat
~ anterior-posterior angle of teeth to be improved
~ teeth might be slightly off the ridge
~ occlusion to be improved - cusp to fossa relationship
~ 4.3 too far in
~ lipline not mainrained
~ wax overextending onto the land area - flanges too bulky
side view - maxillary incisors should be over the depth of the sulcus
~ reduce the wax in the tuberosity and hamular notch area
Well done on all your comments
ReplyDelete2.3 neck is to depressed
ReplyDelete