Mandibular posteriors are not on the ridge. it looks like the mandibular anteriors are falling lingually. the maxillary anteriors also seem like they are falling "in" lingually. The maxillary laterals are slanted too much.
1. Overbite. mandibular anteriors can be lowered and repositioned more labially thus them being on the ridge. 2. Angulation of the maxillary laterals could possibly work.
the overbite is too much the mandibular teeth can be lowered to decrease it. The 2.2's long axis is too much tilted to the distal it should be brought mesialy a little and depress the neck of 1.2.
Mandibular posterior teeth, 3.6 and 3.7 and 4.6 and 4.7 are not on the ridge. Too much of an overbite and the maxillary teeth has to be brought out, necks must be pushed inward.
mandibular posterior teeth are place lingually on the ridge, incisal edges of maxillary anterior teeth need to be brought forward, the maxillary lateral incisors are placed as if the try-in is set up for a female patient(thumbs up for character), incisal edges/placement of mandibular anterior need to be brought anterior(biting forces), anterior teeth should not be caved in, teeth placed straight on mandibular try-in for edge to edge contact
The ridge has been marked, but the teeth isnt placed on the ridge. 1.4 angulatin can be changed to close the gap between the 1st pre molar and the canine. The mandibular anteriors is positioned lingually, it can be brought out more labially so that there isnt an overbite. 2.2 is a bit too skew personally. The canines can also come out a bit on the maxilary then the mandibular teeth won't be lying so lingually.
The mandible Is off the ridge a lot, and tapers inwards towards the posterior. They need to be set more lingually and straightned out. The neck of the 3.3 needs to be pushed in. The mandibuler anteriors need to be lowered to lessen the overbite.
~ try in/ wax up incomplete ~ peripheral roll too thick ~ mandibular teeth off tge ridge - lingually ~ curve of Spee and Monson not equal on either side of arch ~ maxillary incisors incisal edge should be opposite mandibular sulcus area ~ improve occlusion
the mandibular teeth are not placed on the ridge and the angle of the lateral incisors for me personally is to scew
ReplyDeleteMandibular posteriors are not on the ridge. it looks like the mandibular anteriors are falling lingually. the maxillary anteriors also seem like they are falling "in" lingually. The maxillary laterals are slanted too much.
ReplyDelete1. Overbite. mandibular anteriors can be lowered and repositioned more labially thus them being on the ridge.
ReplyDelete2. Angulation of the maxillary laterals could possibly work.
Mandibular posteriors are not on the ridge. the teeth are tired ;) towards to lingual.
ReplyDeletemandibular posteriors are too much lingually, not on the ridge. the 2.2 should be tilted a bit to the mesial.
ReplyDeletethe overbite is too much the mandibular teeth can be lowered to decrease it. The 2.2's long axis is too much tilted to the distal it should be brought mesialy a little and depress the neck of 1.2.
ReplyDeleteMandibular posterior teeth, 3.6 and 3.7 and 4.6 and 4.7 are not on the ridge. Too much of an overbite and the maxillary teeth has to be brought out, necks must be pushed inward.
ReplyDeletemandibular posterior teeth are place lingually on the ridge, incisal edges of maxillary anterior teeth need to be brought forward, the maxillary lateral incisors are placed as if the try-in is set up for a female patient(thumbs up for character), incisal edges/placement of mandibular anterior need to be brought anterior(biting forces), anterior teeth should not be caved in, teeth placed straight on mandibular try-in for edge to edge contact
ReplyDeleteThe ridge has been marked, but the teeth isnt placed on the ridge. 1.4 angulatin can be changed to close the gap between the 1st pre molar and the canine. The mandibular anteriors is positioned lingually, it can be brought out more labially so that there isnt an overbite. 2.2 is a bit too skew personally. The canines can also come out a bit on the maxilary then the mandibular teeth won't be lying so lingually.
ReplyDeleteLateral incisors of maxilla can be adjusted more mesially.
ReplyDeleteposterior teeth of mandible of patients right is off the ridge.
The lower posterior teeth seems to be of the ridge; the midline is off
ReplyDeleteThe mandible Is off the ridge a lot, and tapers inwards towards the posterior. They need to be set more lingually and straightned out. The neck of the 3.3 needs to be pushed in. The mandibuler anteriors need to be lowered to lessen the overbite.
ReplyDeleteMandibular anterior incisal edges are depressed causing an overbite, the mandibuar posterior teeth are off the ridge.
ReplyDeleteMaxillary incisors to flat facialy. Maxillary posteriors necks to depressed
ReplyDeletebig overbite, 2.2 and 1.2 necks are angled too distally. Mandibular teeth arent corresponding to the mandibles ridge.
ReplyDeleteangulation of 2.2 is too much
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete~ try in/ wax up incomplete
Delete~ peripheral roll too thick
~ mandibular teeth off tge ridge - lingually
~ curve of Spee and Monson not equal on either side of arch
~ maxillary incisors incisal edge should be opposite mandibular sulcus area
~ improve occlusion