The long axis of the 2.1 seems to be angled wrong. I think it could be tilted slightly more distally which would straighten the incisal edge and slightly close the incisal embrasure. I agree with Monique on the bulkiness of the root effects. I think in between them could be quite challenging.
The maxillary anteriors can be slightly lowered or the mandibular teeth raised to close gaps anteriorly. the necks of the maxillary centrals are pushed in too much creating a rounded effect of the front of the denture. gingival margins are too deep, creating food traps. maxillary canines can be brought slightly down and out closing the gaps and not looking like it is biting onto the opposing tooth.
1. Maxillary canine neck can be pushed in. 2. Premolars on the mandible can go more towards the mesial 3. NEcks of the maxillary posteriors, patients right, are too depressed.
2.1 needs to be reset, maxillary anteriors could possibly be lowered to give a slight overbite and necks of the maxillary posterior molars needs to be reset as it will affect excursions, the necks need to be pushed in
- maxillary anterior teeth too far forward - left side is higher than pts right for posterior teeth - improve curve of Spee in order for it to be equal on both sides - mandible was waxed on model - improve on the occlusion on pts right - slightly too little overbite
Rot effects on the maxillary anteriors is personally too bulky.
ReplyDeleteThe long axis of the 2.1 seems to be angled wrong. I think it could be tilted slightly more distally which would straighten the incisal edge and slightly close the incisal embrasure. I agree with Monique on the bulkiness of the root effects. I think in between them could be quite challenging.
ReplyDeleteI meant *i think polishing in between them...
DeleteI agree with monique, as it will irritate the patient. and 2.1's neck is way too mesial.
ReplyDeleteAgree with Sam & Monique.
ReplyDeleteThe maxillary anteriors can be slightly lowered or the mandibular teeth raised to close gaps anteriorly. the necks of the maxillary centrals are pushed in too much creating a rounded effect of the front of the denture. gingival margins are too deep, creating food traps. maxillary canines can be brought slightly down and out closing the gaps and not looking like it is biting onto the opposing tooth.
ReplyDeleteRoot effects too bulky. The 1.4 is not occluding, can be tilted anticlockwise to occlude.
ReplyDeletelower the maxillary anterior teeth and put canines at a angle so it fills the space to make occlusion better
ReplyDelete1. Maxillary canine neck can be pushed in.
ReplyDelete2. Premolars on the mandible can go more towards the mesial
3. NEcks of the maxillary posteriors, patients right, are too depressed.
the 2.2 is bit depressed. the long axis of the 2.1 should be tilted slightly to the mesial
ReplyDelete2.2 long axis should be tilted distally as it looks like the set up has malocclusion. The 2.3 neck can be made a little more prominent.
ReplyDelete2.1 needs to be reset, maxillary anteriors could possibly be lowered to give a slight overbite and necks of the maxillary posterior molars needs to be reset as it will affect excursions, the necks need to be pushed in
ReplyDelete1.3 not in the right position. 1.4 and the 1.5 not occluding how it should. possible open bite.
ReplyDeletetheres no occlusal contact between the premolars and the anteriors
ReplyDeleteThe lower anterior teeth are set to high, the midline is off.
ReplyDeleteThe position of the premolars could be improve to have a better occlusion.
2.1 is skew, I dont think the incisal surface sits flat on the table.
ReplyDelete- maxillary anterior teeth too far forward
ReplyDelete- left side is higher than pts right for posterior teeth
- improve curve of Spee in order for it to be equal on both sides
- mandible was waxed on model
- improve on the occlusion on pts right
- slightly too little overbite